Analysis of The Factors Causing Contract Addenda and Their Impact on the Implementation of Construction Projects Within the Government of Gianyar Regency

I Kadek Agus Sweta Adi Putra

doi:10.47616/jamrems.v7i2.729

Autor

I Kadek Agus Sweta Adi Putra Master's Program in Civil Engineering, Udayana University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v7i2.729

Słowa kluczowe:

Contract Addendum, Project Implementation

Abstrakt

Contract addenda frequently occur before, during, or at the completion of construction projects due to technical, administrative, and external factors that influence project implementation. This study aims to identify the dominant factors causing contract addenda and examine their effects on the implementation of government construction projects in Gianyar Regency. A quantitative research design was employed using questionnaire surveys distributed to project stakeholders. Data were analyzed using factor analysis and multiple linear regression with SPSS version 27. The analysis identified seven factors contributing to contract addenda: project disruptions caused by external conditions and internal coordination, planning and design discrepancies, intervention and dependence on external parties, coordination and administrative processes during project preparation together with unpredictable natural conditions, project execution and work methods, changes in work scope, and technical discrepancies. The regression model obtained was Y = 37.980 + 2.524XF1 + 2.853XF2 + 1.845XF3 + 1.831XF4 + 2.127XF5 + 1.720XF6 + 1.844XF7, indicating that all seven factors significantly affect construction project implementation. The findings demonstrate that increases in these factors are associated with a higher likelihood of contract addenda, leading to significant impacts on project cost, quality, and completion time. These results highlight the importance of improving project planning, coordination, and contract management to minimize contract modifications and enhance project performance.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Bibliografia

Abotaleb, I. S., & El-adaway, I. H. (2017). Administering employers’ payment obligations under national and international design–build standard forms of contract. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 9(2), 04517003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000213

Alinaitwe, H. M., Mwakali, J. A., & Hansson, B. (2007). Factors affecting the productivity of building craftsmen‐studies of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 13(3), 169-176.

Assaad, R., El-Adaway, I. H., El Hakea, A. H., Parker, M. J., Henderson, T. I., Salvo, C. R., & Ahmed, M. O. (2020). Contractual perspective for BIM utilization in US construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 146(12), 04020128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001927

Cakmak, P. I. (2022). The stakeholders' perspective on the factors contributing to construction disputes. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(5), 712-727. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-06-2020-0050

Fleischer, J. L., Stein, S. G., Fradin, S. R., Lujan, J. P., Fleischer, J. L., & Hancks, G. (2017). Contracts and Agreements. The Architecture Student's Handbook of Professional Practice, 540-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119304364.ch11

Guarda, G. F., Oliveira, E. C., & Sousa, R. T. D. (2015). Analisys of IT outsourcing contracts at the TCU (Federal Court of Accounts) and of the legislation that governs these contracts in the Brazilian Federal Public administration. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000100005

Indahwati, A. N., Sami’an, S., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2024). Arbitration in Resolving Construction Cost Claim Disputes Due to Time Extensions: A Study of Contract Law in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.388

Karimi, H., Taylor, T. R., & Goodrum, P. M. (2017). Analysis of the impact of craft labour availability on North American construction project productivity and schedule performance. Construction management and economics, 35(6), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1294257

Liyanawatta, T. N., Francis, M., & Ranadewa, K. A. T. O. (2024). Avoiding construction disputes: a comprehensive framework for pre-contract planning. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(12), 1282-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2276652

Nasir, M. K., & Hadikusumo, B. H. (2019). System dynamics model of contractual relationships between owner and contractor in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(1), 04018052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000666

Nepal, M. P., Park, M., & Son, B. (2006). Effects of schedule pressure on construction performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 132(2), 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(182)

Papadonikolaki, E. (2018). Loosely coupled systems of innovation: Aligning BIM adoption with implementation in Dutch construction. Journal of management in engineering, 34(6), 05018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000644

Seboka, D. A., & Gidebo, F. A. (2026). Investigating the effectiveness of contract administration at construction stage to averting substandard construction performance: In Shagar city public building projects. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 25(2), 1325-1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2467249

Silva, P. M., Domingo, N., & Ameer Ali, N. A. N. (2024). Causes of disputes in the construction industry–a systematic literature review. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 29(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-03-2023-0012

Soeharto, I. (1999). Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual sampai Operasional). Manajemen Proyek Jilid 1 (Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional), 60 (5), 674–679.

Webb, C., Gao, L., & Song, L. G. (2016). Schedule compression impact on construction project safety. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2(4), 344-350.