Company and Community Conflict Management at Mining Sites

Egileak

  • Evi Yulianti STIE Mahardhika, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Pompong Budi Setiadi STIE Mahardhika, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sri Rahayu STIE Mahardhika, Surabaya, Indonesia

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v3i2.291

Gako-hitzak:

Conflict, Society, Company, Mining, Organization, Resistance, Resolution

Laburpena

This study discusses similar cases in various regions in Indonesia. Discussions about these cases generally see conflicts of interest as the main cause of the emergence of resistance or mining conflicts. because they think that the mining process causes environmental damage, socio-cultural changes, and various other negative impacts, and persistent (supportive) groups from the government and their staff sometimes support this mining process because mining can be used for economic progress. And this paper also aims to identify whether the resistance carried out by this community is a form of social movement or not. Land has an important role for human life, the need for land from day to day continues to increase so that it is vulnerable to land problems. The purpose of this study is to find out the forms of conflict, the causes of conflict and how the government's role in resolving conflicts that occur. It is hoped that by doing this research it can be seen how the forms of conflict that occur between the community and the company.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Erreferentziak

Dharmawan, A. H. (2006). Konflik-Sosial Dan Resolusi Konflik: Analisis Sosio-Budaya (Dengan Fokus Perhatian Kalimantan Barat). In Seminar PERAGI Pontianak (Pp. 10-11).

Fajar, D. P. (2016). Teori-teori Komunikasi Konflik: Upaya Memahami Memetakan Konflik. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions. American Psychological Association.

O’Brien, K. (2018). Is the 1.5 C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153-160.

Orazani, S. N., & Leidner, B. (2019). A case for social change in Iran: Greater support and mobilization potential for nonviolent than violent social movements. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(1).

Sumartias, S., & Rahmat, A. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi konflik sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 16(1), 13-20.

Susan, N. (2014). Pengantar sosiologi konflik. Kencana.

Usman, R. (2001). Konflik Dalam Perspektif Komunikasi: Suatu Tinjauan Teoretis. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(1), 31-41.

Veeger, C., & Visser, A. J. (1993). Dissociation of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Aqueous and Reversed Micellar Solutions: a Time‐Resolved Polarized Fluorescence Study. European Journal of Biochemistry, 212(1), 63-67.

##submission.downloads##

Argitaratuta

2022-06-29