Risk Management in the Development and Operation of TPS 3R in Panjer Urban Village, Denpasar

I Gede  Arya; Kadek Diana  Harmayani; Ida Bagus Putu  Adnyana

doi:10.47616/jamrems.v6i4.631

Authors

I Gede Arya Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
Kadek Diana Harmayani Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
Ida Bagus Putu Adnyana Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v6i4.631

Keywords:

Risk Management, TPS 3R, Risk Mitigation, Risk Allocation, Time and Cost Impact

Abstract

The rapid urbanization in Denpasar City has intensified the challenges of municipal solid waste management, especially after the closure of the Suwung Final Disposal Site due to overcapacity. In response, the local government initiated the development of 3R-based Waste Processing Facilities (TPS 3R) at the community level, including the facility in Panjer Urban Village. However, the implementation of this community-based infrastructure project faces significant risks, ranging from technical and operational issues to social resistance.This study aims to analyze the risk management process in the development and operation of the TPS 3R Panjer, focusing on risk identification, assessment, classification, mitigation planning, and risk ownership allocation. The research employed a semi-quantitative descriptive method with a case study approach, supported by primary data from questionnaires and expert interviews. A total of 58 validated risks were assessed using a risk matrix adapted from Godfrey, combining frequency and consequence scores based on Likert scales.The results show that 67% of the identified risks fall into the "Unacceptable" and "Undesirable" categories. These risks are primarily related to community rejection, lack of technical capacity, and poor coordination. Risk mitigation strategies were formulated, and responsibilities were assigned among key stakeholders including the Public Works Department, Urban Village Office, Traditional Village leaders, Field Facilitator Team (FFT), and Community-Based Organization (CBO). The findings emphasize the importance of participatory planning, technical readiness, and structured risk control to minimize delays and cost overruns in TPS 3R implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alyka, F., & Andari, G. S. B. (2025). Analysis of the Operational Performance of TPS 3R and its Development Potential Towards Indonesia's Zero Waste 2050 Target. Journal of Social Research, 4(7), 1495-1503. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i7.2630

Amheka, A., Higano, Y., Mizunoya, T., & Yabar, H. (2015). An overview of current household waste management in Indonesia: development of a new integrated strategy. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 15(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2015.066953

Aprilia, R., Noerhayati, E., & Rahmawati, A. (2024). Characterization of waste composition as a basis for developing a community-based 3R TPS system in waste management efforts. Asian Journal of Toxicology, Environmental, and Occupational Health, 2(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.61511/ajteoh.v2i1.2024.1010

Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk Management and Construction. Cambridge: University Press.

Godfrey, P. S. (1996). Control of risk: a guide to the systematic management of risk from construction. Construction Industry Research and Information Association.

Hossain, I., Haque, A. M., Ullah, S. A., Kadir, A., & Hossain, K. (2025). Local Government Challenges in Implementing the 3R Strategy for Sustainable Waste Management. In Intersecting Environmental Governance With Technological Advancements (pp. 465-490). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7001-8.ch017

Mariana, K. (2023). Optimalisasi Pengelolaan Manajemen Resiko Dalam Industri Maritim. PROSIDING.

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal tabularasa, 6(1), 87-97.

Muka, I. W. (2013). Analisis Risiko pada proyek pembangunan parkir basement jalan Sulawesi Denpasar. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 19(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v19i2.8425

Patanakul, P. (2014). Managing large-scale IS/IT projects in the public sector: Problems and causes leading to poor performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.12.004

Raharjo, S., Junaidi, N. E., Bachtiar, V. S., Ruslinda, Y., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2016, October). Development of community-based waste recycling (garbage bank and 3R waste treatment facility) for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in Padang City, Indonesia. In 2016 Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon) (pp. MIT-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025259

Sugiono, S. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r & d. Bandung: Alfabeta, 288.

Suliyanto, S. (2011, May). Perbedaan Pandangan Skala likert sebagai Skala Ordinal atau skala Interval. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Statistika Universitas Diponegoro 2011 (pp. 51-60). Program Studi Statistika FMIPA Undip.

Yuliana, C. (2017). Manajemen Risiko Kontrak Untuk Proyek Konstruksi. Rekayasa Sipil, 11(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2017.011.01.2

Zahrah, Y., Yu, J., & Liu, X. (2024). How Indonesia’s cities are grappling with plastic waste: an integrated approach towards sustainable Plastic Waste Management. Sustainability, 16(10), 3921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16103921