Civil Servant Behavior Towards Public Service Compliance: A case study in Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i3.665Keywords:
Civil Servants, Compliance, Professionalism, Public ServiceAbstract
This study examines the behavior of civil servants toward compliance in public service delivery within the bureaucratic framework of Makassar City. Employing a qualitative literature review approach, the research synthesizes contemporary studies published between 2015 and 2024 to analyze how professionalism, ethics, leadership, and organizational culture collectively shape compliance behavior in Indonesia’s public sector. The findings reveal that compliance is not solely a function of regulatory enforcement but rather a product of moral internalization, professional competence, and ethical leadership. Bureaucratic structures characterized by hierarchy and procedural rigidity tend to produce formal rather than substantive compliance, emphasizing rule adherence over ethical responsibility. Conversely, environments that foster trust, reflective leadership, and participatory accountability cultivate intrinsic motivation among civil servants to uphold public service values. The review further underscores that training, merit-based human resource systems, and digital transparency mechanisms are essential in transforming compliance from a rule-bound duty into a professional ethos. Theoretical implications highlight the need for management scholars to reconceptualize compliance as an evolving moral capability shaped by institutional culture and leadership ethics. Practically, the study recommends integrated reform strategies that balance regulatory control with ethical empowerment and community engagement. Ultimately, sustainable compliance in Makassar’s bureaucracy and comparable governance contexts depends on embedding integrity and professionalism within the managerial core of public administration, aligning bureaucratic systems with the ethical aspirations of democratic governance.
Downloads
References
Akpa, V. O., Asikhia, O. U., & Nneji, N. E. (2021). Organizational culture and organizational performance: A review of literature. International journal of advances in engineering and management, 3(1), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0301361372
Amankwa, E., Loock, M., & Kritzinger, E. (2022). The determinants of an information security policy compliance culture in organisations: the combined effects of organisational and behavioural factors. Information & Computer Security, 30(4), 583-614. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-10-2021-0169
Andreetta, S., & Kolloch, A. (2022). Politicised Bureaucrats: Conflicting Loyalties, Professionalism and the Law in the Making of Public Services. International Journal of Law in Context, 18(3), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000246
Arghode, V., Lathan, A., Alagaraja, M., Rajaram, K., & McLean, G. N. (2022). Empathic organizational culture and leadership: conceptualizing the framework. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-09-2020-0139
Babri, M., Davidson, B., & Helin, S. (2021). An updated inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics: 2005-2016. Journal of Business Ethics, 71-108.
Grande, V., Kinnunen, P., Peters, A. K., Barr, M., Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., ... & Thota, N. (2022). Role Modeling as a Computing Educator in Higher Education: A Focus on Care, Emotions and Professional Competencies. In Proceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 37-63). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571785.3574122
Jancsics, D., Espinosa, S., & Carlos, J. (2023). Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors. Management Review Quarterly, 73(3), 1273-1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00274-9
Jumady, E., & Lilla, L. (2021). Antecedent and consequence the human resources management factors on civil servant performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 1(2), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v1i2.101
Kazmi, S. I. H., Alam, M., & Malik, M. M. (2023). Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: The Moderating Role of Value-Based Leadership. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 12(3), 1204-1222. https://doi.org/10.62345/
Khanal, R., Gupta, A. K., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2022). Civil servants’ integrity in public sector: The case of Nepal. Heliyon, 8(12).
Lazarević-Moravčević, M., & Mosurović Ružičić, M. (2023). Organizational structure and organizational culture-impact on innovative behavior of the organization. Economic Analysis, 56(2), 39-53.
Mohi Ud Din, Q., & Zhang, L. (2023). Unveiling the mechanisms through which leader integrity shapes ethical leadership behavior: Theory of planned behavior perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110928
Qin, X., Liu, X., Brown, J. A., Zheng, X., & Owens, B. P. (2021). Humility harmonized? Exploring whether and how leader and employee humility (in) congruence influences employee citizenship and deviance behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 147-165.
Riani, N. K., Candiasa, I. M., Yudana, I. M., & Dantes, K. R. (2022). Application for Measurement of the Influence of Accountability, Nationalism, Public Ethics, Quality Commitment, and Anti-corruption (AQEAP) on the Civil Servant Teachers' Performance. International journal of health sciences, 6(2), 597-613. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.7376
Saprudin, S. (2023). Bureaucratic Ethics in Public Services in South Konawe Regency: A Literature Review. Journal Dimensie Management and Public Sector, 4(4), 42-52.
Setiawan, K. M. (2022). Vulnerable but resilient: Indonesia in an age of democratic decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 58(3), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2022.2139168
Suprayitno, N. F., & Abbas, S. A. (2024). Bureaucratic transformation in Indonesia: An in-depth analysis from the perspective of public administration. Mandat: Journal of Politics, Government, and Public Administration, 1(1), 34-51.
Svara, J. H. (2021). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations. USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Uluturk, B., Yilmaz Altuntas, E., & Isik, T. (2023). Impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and work-related burnout among Turkish street-level bureaucrats: The roles of public service motivation, perceived organizational support, and red tape. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(6), 1502-1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2256705
Upadhyaya, S. (2025). Meritocracy Vs. Bureaucratic Patronage: Examining the Indian Civil Service System. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5248512
Young, S. L., & Tanner, J. (2023). Citizen participation matters. Bureaucratic discretion matters more. Public Administration, 101(3), 747-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12867
Zeb, A., Akbar, F., Hussain, K., Safi, A., Rabnawaz, M., & Zeb, F. (2021). The competing value framework model of organizational culture, innovation and performance. Business process management journal, 27(2), 658-683. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2019-0464
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

























